Cases

The Kay Park Parish Church Tribunal Decision – A Turning Point for Mast Landlords

Matt Restall

Specialist Telecom Surveyor

Case Name: On Tower UK Ltd v The General Trustees of the Church of Scotland (Kay Park Parish Church)

Citation: [2024] Lands Tribunal for Scotland (unpublished as of May 2025 — summary available via legal reporting services)

Date: August 2024

Kay Park Tribunal Decision: What Landlords Should Know

Background

In August 2024, the Scottish Lands Tribunal delivered a pivotal ruling in the case of On Tower UK Ltd v The Church of Scotland General Trustees concerning a telecoms mast situated at Kay Park Parish Church in Kilmarnock. The site had experienced multiple lease assignments over the years, transitioning from Orange PCS to EE and Three UK, then to Arqiva, and finally to On Tower UK Ltd (OTUK). Crucially, these assignments were executed without the landlord’s formal consent, despite the lease containing specific restrictions on such transfers.

OTUK sought to renew the lease under the Electronic Communications Code, proposing a significantly reduced rent of £3,000 per annum. However, the Tribunal determined that OTUK was not the legal tenant at the time of serving the renewal notice, rendering the notice — and the subsequent application — invalid.

Key Issues

  • Lease Assignments and Tenant Legitimacy

The case underscored the importance of adhering to lease provisions regarding assignments. OTUK had acquired the site through a chain of transfers, but at no point had the landlord — the General Trustees of the Church of Scotland — formally consented to any of them. The original lease required such consent for any valid assignment. The Tribunal held that the final leaseholder (OTUK) had no legal standing to renew the agreement because it was not properly assigned the lease.

  • Invalid Code Notices

Since OTUK was not the legal tenant, it had no right to serve a notice under paragraph 33 of the Electronic Communications Code. As such, its application for a new lease under the Code failed entirely. This decision reinforces the importance of operators ensuring they have proper legal standing before attempting to invoke Code rights.

  • Rent Valuation Dispute

OTUK had proposed a new rent of just £3,000 per annum — far below market expectations. While rent valuation wasn’t ultimately decided due to the procedural failure, the case highlights the continuing trend of operators attempting to drive down rents dramatically, often using procedural routes that don’t hold up under scrutiny.

Why This Case Matters to UK Landlords

Although this case was heard in Scotland, it was decided under the UK-wide Electronic Communications Code, which applies across England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. As a result, this ruling has strong persuasive value for mast landlords throughout the UK — particularly in cases involving:

  • Unlawful lease assignments

  • Disputes over notice validity

  • Operator attempts to bypass landlord rights under the guise of the Code

Landlords should take note that where consent clauses exist in legacy leases, operators may not have the automatic right to renew or assign without proper compliance. This can give landlords an opportunity to challenge unlawful occupation or push for more favourable terms.

What This Means for Landlords

  • Check assignment history: Ensure any tenant claiming rights under the Code has followed the proper procedures set out in the original lease.

  • Scrutinise Code notices: Just because a notice is served doesn’t mean it’s valid — the sender must have legal standing.

  • Seek professional advice: The evolving legal landscape makes it essential for landlords to be supported by experienced telecoms advisors and solicitors.

If you need expert advice on the topics discussed in this article, our specialist surveyors can help:

  • EE Phone Mast Leases

  • Three Phone Mast Leases

  • Arqiva Phone Mast Leases

  • Phone Mast Lease Renewals

  • New Phone Mast Lettings

Call us on 01691 791543 or contact us online for a free consultation.

Matt Restall

Founder & Specialist Telecom Surveyor, The Phone Mast Advice Company Ltd

Matt Restall has over 30 years' experience advising UK landlords on phone mast leases and rent reviews. He instigated and advised on the landmark Compton Beauchamp Estates v CTIL case and has completed over 10,000 deals on behalf of landowners across England and Wales. Matt represents landlords — never operators.

Back to Blog

You May Also Need

Lease Renewals

Expert lease renewal negotiation

Rent Reviews

Are you being underpaid?

Free Lease Check

Check your lease for free

Free Rent Estimate

Find out your true market rent

New Lettings

Start on the right terms

Mast Sales

Capitalise on your lease income

Related Articles

AP Wireless II Tribunal Ruling: Impact on LandlordsA recent ruling in AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd v On Tower UK Ltd has introduced new considerations that could impact telecom...CTIL Appeal Loss: Key Lessons for Phone Mast LandlordsThe case of Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd (CTIL) v. Compton Beauchamp Estates Ltd has been a signifi...The Pippingford Case: Rent Negotiation InsightsCase Name: EE Limited and Hutchison 3G UK Limited v Richard Morriss and others Citation: County Court, England and Wales...
View all articles →

Ready to Get Expert Phone Mast Advice?

Contact us today for a free, no-obligation consultation. We only act for landlords — never for mobile phone operators.

Get Your Free Rent EstimateContact Us
📞 01691 791543✉️ info@phonemastadvice.co.uk💬 WhatsApp: 447843352654