AP Wireless II Tribunal Ruling: Impact on Landlords
Matt Restall
Specialist Telecom Surveyor
A recent ruling in AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd v On Tower UK Ltd has introduced new considerations that could impact telecom lease negotiations. While we are still assessing the full implications, this decision appears to provide certain landlords with a stronger footing when negotiating rents for agreements that predate the 2017 Electronic Communications Code.
AP Wireless II Ruling: What It Means for Landlords
For years, telecom operators have used the Code’s valuation framework to justify significant rent reductions, often leaving landlords with little room to negotiate. However, this latest ruling suggests that, in certain cases, landlords may have stronger grounds to push back against these reductions and secure a more appropriate rent.
We have identified some hidden advantages within this case that could work in landlords’ favour. Additionally, we have developed unique arguments based on this ruling that could significantly improve negotiations—not just in terms of rental offers, but also regarding contractual terms.
The Best Approach Moving Forward
While this ruling presents new opportunities, applying it effectively to your situation requires a strategic approach. With our in-depth understanding of the case and its nuances, we can help landlords maximise their position and achieve the best possible terms.
If you are negotiating a lease renewal or reviewing an operator’s offer, contact The Phone Mast Advice Company Ltd today. Our expertise could help significantly improve the rent and contractual terms on the table.
Related Services
If you need expert advice on the topics discussed in this article, our specialist surveyors can help:
-
Phone Mast Rent Reviews
-
Get a Free Rent Estimate
-
Phone Mast Lease Renewals
-
Get a Free Lease Check
Call us on 01691 791543 or contact us online for a free consultation.
Matt Restall
Founder & Specialist Telecom Surveyor, The Phone Mast Advice Company Ltd
Matt Restall has over 30 years' experience advising UK landlords on phone mast leases and rent reviews. He instigated and advised on the landmark Compton Beauchamp Estates v CTIL case and has completed over 10,000 deals on behalf of landowners across England and Wales. Matt represents landlords — never operators.